Skip to content

GPB Capital Transferred to Receivership to Split Assets Among Investors

GPB Capital Transferred to Receivership to Split Assets Among Investors. Broker-dealer, brokerage, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, financial services, FINRA, GPB Holdings, RIA
GPB Capital Transferred to Receivership to Split Assets Among Investors. Broker-dealer, brokerage, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, financial services, FINRA, GPB Holdings, RIA

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York has officially granted the SEC’s request to convert the ongoing monitorship over GPB Capital Holdings LLC and multiple affiliated entities into a receivership.

As The DI Wire previously reported in February 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission has charged three GPB Capital executives and their affiliated entities with running a “Ponzi-like scheme” that raised more than $1.7 billion from securities issued by the New York-based asset management firm and registered investment adviser. The SEC also charged GPB with violating the whistleblower protection laws.

According to the SEC’s complaint, David Gentile, the owner and chief executive officer of GPB Capital, and Jeffry Schneider, the owner of GPB Capital’s placement agent Ascendant Capital, lied to investors about the source of money used to make an annualized distribution payment to investors. Investors were allegedly told that the distribution payments were paid exclusively with monies generated by GPB Capital’s portfolio companies, but GPB Capital actually used investor money to pay portions of the annualized distribution payments. According to the SEC, to perpetuate the deception, GPB Capital allegedly manipulated the financial statements to give the false appearance that the funds’ income was closer to generating sufficient income to cover the distribution payments than it actually was. GPB Capital also allegedly violated the whistleblower provisions of the securities laws by including language in termination and separation agreements that impeded individuals from coming forward to the SEC, and by retaliating against a known whistleblower.

The SEC’s complaint, filed in federal court for the Eastern District of New York, charged Gentile, Schneider, GPB Capital, Ascendant Alternative Strategies, and Ascendant Capital with violating the antifraud provisions of the SEC, and Jeffrey Lash with aiding and abetting certain of those violations. The complaint also charged GPB Capital and Gentile with violating the antifraud provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and charged GPB Capital with violating the registration and whistleblower provisions of the Exchange Act and the Advisers Act’s custody and compliance rules. The complaint sought disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest and penalties.

On Feb. 12, 2021, the Court appointed a monitor, Joseph T. Gardemal III, to oversee GPB Capital.  On June 13, 2022, the SEC moved to convert the monitorship into a receivership because of GPB’s alleged breach of the monitor order. On June 7, 2023, the Court entered a partial judgment against Lash by consent in which he agreed to be permanently enjoined from violations of the charged provisions.

Finally, on Dec. 7, 2023, the Court granted the SEC’s motion, and on Dec. 8, 2023, the Court appointed Gardemal as receiver over GPB Capital and numerous affiliated entities. Pursuant to the terms of the order, within 45 days, the receiver shall provide the Court an accounting of receivership assets and propose a plan to distribute assets to investors.

Click here to visit The DI Wire directory page.